When I wrote about the election yesterday, I had in mind that there were issues to be voted on that would encourage more Amish to cast their vote. After all, more readily available abortions, gay marriage, and the legalisation of cannabis for recreational purposes must surely be issues that the Amish have an opinion about. But the more I thought about it, the more I realised I was quite wrong. Yes, the Amish do have an opinion, but no, they did not turn out in their droves to vote.
Why not? Well, while the Amish do have their opinions (and they are certainly aware of the issues), they do not feel that the issues directly affect them. For one thing, abortion is pretty rare amongst a people who believe in the absolute sanctity of human life; stricter enforcement of the death penalty is not going to encourage votes from amongst a people who refuse to participate in violence of any sort; homosexual activity is almost unheard of amongst a people who take the Biblical view literally, where it describes such activity as 'unnatural' and 'an abomination'; drug misuse, while not totally absent, is still not common amongst a people that accept the human body is the 'temple of the Holy Spirirt' and that they must not defile it.
So you see, because the Amish have got these matters more or less under control in their own communities, they do not feel the need to try to impose their values on the rest of civil society.
The election is now over; Barak Obama has been returned to office for a further four years. Would the Amish population have preferred Romney, with his traditional stand on family values? Yes, probably. So why did they not vote for him and 'save' their country from legalising practices that are abhorent to them? The fact is, they do not see America as their country primarily. They belong to the Kingdom of God; they believe in the total separation of Church and State - one should not dictate, or try to impose, on the other. Whatever the laws of the land allow, the Amish will continue to teach and live by the precepts found in the Bible. They will still not allow abortion, or gay marriage, or cannabis use for recreational purposes. So in that sense, voting or not voting will have had no effect upon them. And, they believe, will have had no effect on the country at large either.
Showing posts with label US election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US election. Show all posts
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
The Race for the White House
Today, America goes to the polls. Will the Amish and Mennonites cast a vote for one or the other, or do they refuse to exercise their right? You won’t be surprised to hear that it is more complicated than that.
In the past, around 10% of Amish have voted in elections.
These are mostly when the election has an element about which the Amish have a
particular concern. So, back in 1954, they voted, because one of the issues
related to allowing children to leave school at 14.
Mennonites, on the other hand, do not vote. Well, conservative
Mennonites don’t vote anyway. It is in their church standards (a written
document of church ‘rules’). They have little if anything to do with state government,
believing it is not the province of the Christian to dabble in politics.
So what is the biblical basis for not voting? And why do 90%
of Amish not vote?
The first answer is that they believe in what can be described
as ‘two kingdom’ theology. There is the state government; then there is the
kingdom of God. These two are separate and should not come together. The state
should have no control over the church, and the church should not try to impose
Christian values on the state. While the
Amish do respect governments, accepting that all the powers and authorities in
place are put there by God, they consider that their first allegiance is to God’s
laws and His kingdom – and God tells Christians to be separate (2 Corinthians
6v17). The Amish and Mennonites believe that this refers to all matters in
life, which includes voting.
There are good policies and bad policies put forward by any
given candidate in an election campaign. This year, for example, Obama is
inclined to instigate a redefining of ‘marriage’ to allow same sex couples to
marry. The Amish are opposed to that policy. They are also unhappy with the
state of the national debt in America. While Obama may have some positive
policies too, for an Amishman to vote for him would make him (in his own eyes) ‘partaker
of (Obama’s) evil deeds’ (2 John v11); the Amishman would feel he was also
supporting the policies he objects to by casting a vote for Obama.
That is not to say that the Amish have their heads in the
sand. They are well aware of the issues facing the country and are well
informed, despite their lack of television and radio. They are also well aware
of the difference between the two candidates for today’s election. They know
that Obama, while calling himself a Christian, supports gay marriage (something
the Amish see as a contradiction); they know that Romney is a Mormon. Those who
do vote today, however, are most likely to vote for the Mormon than the
professed Christian, because he supports traditional values, freedom of
religion, and the family. But I doubt there will be a huge turnout. Partly,
that is because the government has made it more difficult for a person to vote
if they do not have photo ID – the Amish object to having photographs, because
they believe it violates the 2nd commandment about graven images.
But mainly, it will be because the Amish hold the state and government at arms
length, preferring to live quietly and peaceably in the land.I am not resident in the US and therefore I will not be going to the polls today. Do I vote in my own country? The answer is no, I don’t. Too many of our politicians fail to live up to their promises; or they cannot pursue those policies once they are in office. They too have good policies and bad policies mixed together. In all conscience, I cannot vote for someone who supports, for example, more freedom in abortion, even if they also support more freedom for religion or home education. I too consider it to be ‘partaking of their evil deeds’ to vote for a person who supports something I cannot in all conscience support. The government is put in place by God. If God wants Romney instead of Obama, that is the leader America will get. If God wants Conservatives rather than Labour, then that is the government the UK will get. Government is for the punishment of evil doers and the regulation of life so that all may live in peace and quiet; they are entitled to use force to achieve that aim. As a Christian, I want to have no part in that; and neither do the Amish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)