The Reformation in Switzerland
Martin Luther did not intend to spark the revolution that
followed the publication of his Ninety-Five Theses. True, he wanted reform, but
not in the way it actually occurred. His treatise found its way to the Pope. A heresy
case was formulated against Luther and he was summoned to Rome. The Elector
Frederick, wishing to guarantee the safety of Luther, persuaded the Pope to
hold the examination (trial) at Augsburg instead, before the Imperial Diet (ie
the General Assembly of the states of the Roman Empire in Germany). Luther appeared
before the Diet in October 1518. The hearings degenerated into a shouting
match, during which Luther stated that he did not consider the papacy part of
the Biblical church. He claimed that Matthew 16v18, where Jesus gives the keys
of the kingdom to Peter, did not give the Pope the exclusive right to interpret
the Bible and that Popes were not infallible.
Not surprisingly, Luther became ‘public enemy number 1’ and
he was excommunicated. He set about redefining church practice in line with
what he had read in the Bible. He also translated the bible from Latin into
German and taught people to read so they could study the Scriptures for
themselves. By 1526, Luther was involved in establishing new churches which
became known as Lutheran churches. Although he changed many things, such as the
practice of indulgences, he continued the practice of infant baptism and
believed that the church should be territorial – ie that any given state should
have an official religion and that all members of that state were expected or
even compelled to be a part. Entry into this state-church was through baptism.
There were some who did not believe that Luther had gone far
enough in his reforms, particularly in the area of communion. The Catholic
church taught that the bread and wine became the actual body and blood of
Christ and that the communion was a re-sacrifice. Luther considered that Christ
was present in the sacrament, though not in the emblems themselves:
“Despite Luther’s independent thinking on the Lord’s Supper, in most
aspects, he remained very close to Roman Catholic theology and practice. Though
he rejected the adoration of the consecrated host, he affirmed the idea of
reverence in the forms of bowing or prostrating oneself before the table. He
insisted that the object of adoration should be Jesus Christ, as He is present
in the sacrament, not the bread and wine.” [http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2008/02/11/luther-vs-zwingli-2-luther-on-the-lords-supper/
]
Meanwhile,
in Switzerland, a number of the followers of Luther were becoming increasingly
unhappy with the trappings of Catholicism which Luther continued to practice. Among
them was
Huldrych Zwingli
Grossmünster, Zurich
Zwingli was born in Switzerland in 1484 and so was only a
year younger than Luther. During his education into the priesthood, he had been
influenced by the writings of Erasmus
and Luther. When he became a minister of the Grossmünster (cathedral)
at Zurich in 1518, he rapidly began preaching on his ideas for reforming the
church. He disapproved of fasting during Lent, promoted marriage for the clergy
(hitherto, they had to be celibate), he attacked the use of images and icons in
worship and he introduced a new form of eucharist to replace the mass. Like Luther,
he believed that the church should be territorial and to that end, he retained
infant baptism.
Switzerland was divided into counties called cantons. Several
of these cantons took up the reformed theology; the rest remained Catholic. Zwingli
formed an alliance between the reformed cantons against the Catholic cantons,
which almost led to war between them. While a full scale war was averted, there
were some battles and Zwingli was killed during one of these skirmishes, in
1531. He was 47 years old.
During this period, church leaders from both sides of the
theological divide would meet together to discuss their differences. These meetings
were called ‘disputations’ and were usually held in public, with many churchmen
and university professors being invited to listen and take part. One such disputation
(the second disputation) took place in September 1523. Around 900 people were
present. The subjects under discussion were icons and images, the sacrificial
nature of the communion, and the necessity of infant baptism. The matter of
icons was not fully resolved. Zwingli, not wishing to cause further falling
out, said he believed that as icons were not used much anyway, it would only be
a matter of time before the churches realised he had no need of them and
dispensed with them.
During the discussion about communion, the question was
raised whether the Zurich city council had the right to make any determination
on the matters of church practice. This was a new development. Up until this
point, the church and state had been inextricably linked, with the formation of
the Holy Roman Empire; church and state acted as one. This was now being
questioned. The subject of the communion itself however, dragged on until 1525,
when, at the Easter celebration, communion was celebrated under Zwingli’s new
liturgy – communion was not an essential requirement for salvation, nor was the
communion a re-enactment of the sacrifice of Christ at Calvary; instead,
communion was celebrated as a commemoration of that sacrifice.
The subject of infant baptism also continued for some years
after the disputation. Eventually, in the interests of peace, Zwingli agreed
with the Zurich council that any changes would be introduced slowly. He published
an article stating the different points of view and held meetings in private
with those who opposed infant baptism. The city council called for a public
debate, following which, the council made the final determination, in favour of
Zwingli and infant baptism. Anyone who refused to have their babies baptised
was forced to leave Zurich and branded a heretic.
Amongst those who disagreed with Zwingli’s position and the
council’s decision was a small group of men who wanted speedier change and more
rapid reform. Especially they wanted infant baptism replaced by baptism for
consenting adults. This group was led by a young man named Conrad Grebel.
To be
continued...
No comments:
Post a Comment